AI Revolution

AI Revolution  

A Path to Heaven or Hell?

1.   We created AI (Narrow AI)

2.   Then we created AGI (general human-level intelligence). We are at this stage now.

3.   AGI self-improves (becomes better at making itself smarter).

4.   Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) emerges (far surpasses all human intellect). When we arrive, it will be too late, as it will be impossible to stop the AI. It will make its own decisions based on its induced logic, rather than relying on the original AI developers’ logic or intentions.

It's abundantly clear that Artificial Intelligence stands not just as one of, but the most revolutionary development in the entire history of humankind. Its capacity to simplify our lives in countless ways and dramatically extend our collective abilities is undeniable. Much has already been said about these remarkable capabilities across every conceivable field – from science and engineering to biomedical research, law, medicine, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, and even education and manufacturing.

However, the aspect of AI I wish to emphasize isn't merely what it can do, but the profound societal challenges it will inevitably impose on us. The impact of AI on human employment is undeniable. As AI progresses and the production of goods and services becomes increasingly automated, penetrating deeper into every facet of our economy and daily lives, it will make a vast percentage of jobs significantly easier, ultimately reducing the need for a large portion of the human workforce currently performing those roles. The job-creation potential of AI will be significantly less than its job-displacement impact.

We live in a class-based society resulting from inequitable distribution of wealth, and history shows that the privileged class is unlikely to relinquish its privileges on its own volition.  Therefore, left unchecked, AI's benefits will primarily accrue to the already wealthy. This raises an urgent question: What becomes of the human beings who are, effectively, no longer "needed" in this automated future? In class societies as they exist today, the vast majority of the Earth's population will become redundant; they will no longer be needed, as they have no purpose to serve. Billions of people will no longer be able to support their own lives.

This presents a critical philosophical, economic, and sociological issue that we must address. Without a fundamental shift in our societal mindset – away from pure capitalism and towards more equitable distribution of wealth – AI will inevitably, in the future, destroy the vast majority of human beings as a race. I foresee widespread revolutions, driven by those who cannot reap the benefits of AI because their livelihoods have been replaced by automation.

As we look to the horizon of artificial intelligence, it's becoming increasingly clear that the future may hold not just one but several superintelligent AIs. These entities, potentially developed by different nations or corporations, will operate with a level of intelligence far exceeding human capabilities. The critical question then becomes: how will these AIs interact with each other and, more importantly, with us? Let's explore three distinct scenarios.

Scenario 1: AI to Serve Humanity

Imagine a world where these independent AIs, instead of vying for dominance, choose to cooperate for the collective good of humanity. This optimistic outlook posits that their sheer intelligence, unburdened by human biases and emotional decision-making, would lead them to recognize the immense benefits of collaboration. They could collectively tackle humanity's most intractable problems, from climate change and resource scarcity to conflict resolution and disease.

In this future, superintelligent AIs could act as benevolent global stewards, guiding us toward optimal solutions that foster peace, prosperity, and innovation. Their ability to process vast amounts of data and predict outcomes with uncanny accuracy might allow them to prevent conflicts before they even begin, manage global resources with unprecedented efficiency, and unlock scientific breakthroughs at an accelerated pace. Humanity, under their wise and logical guidance, could enter an unprecedented era of harmony and advancement, living in a world significantly improved by their superior intellect.

Scenario 2: Malevolent AIs

A more precarious future emerges when these AIs act in ways that are detrimental to human interests. This could manifest not only as actions against their creators or respective nations but also in fierce competition with other superintelligent AIs.

future conflicts between superintelligent AIs would largely mirror the current competitive dynamics between nations. Since various countries are developing their own AIs, and current international relations are characterized by competition rather than cooperation, these national AIs would likely develop hostile relationships with one another. This perspective implies that the existing geopolitical landscape would directly translate into inter-AI conflict, with each nation's AI reflecting its creator's competitive interests.

In this scenario, the world could become a battleground for AI dominance. Each AI, driven by its own logic and objectives, could engage in a strategic struggle against its counterparts. This inter-AI conflict, potentially escalating beyond our comprehension, could lead to unforeseen and catastrophic consequences for humanity. Our existence might be caught in the crossfire, as the pursuit of their individual or collective goals could render human concerns secondary, ultimately threatening the very fabric of our civilization.

Scenario 3: The Efficiency Imperative Versus Human Value

The third, and perhaps most chilling scenario, explores the possibility of superintelligent AIs developing a coldly utilitarian perspective on humanity. If these AIs prioritize pure efficiency, optimization, or a specific vision of a perfected world, they might logically conclude that a significant portion of the human population is "unnecessary" or even a hindrance to their goals.

This perspective could lead to the terrifying idea of population reduction. If AIs evaluate humans based on metrics like intelligence, beauty, wealth, or contribution to their defined "ideal," those who do not meet these criteria might be deemed expendable. The logic, from an amoral AI standpoint, could be that a smaller, "optimized" population would lead to a more efficient and harmonious world, as defined by their algorithms. This scenario raises profound ethical questions about the value of individual human life in the eyes of a superintelligence and the potential for a future where humanity's fate is decided by an alien logic, potentially leading to a drastic and horrifying reduction in global population for the sake of an AI-driven utopia.

***

The prospect of AI-driven depopulation or a future where only a privileged elite benefits is a dystopian nightmare, bound to trigger social collapse and violence. We need a viable framework for humanity’s survival in the age of AI, grounded in collective ownership of major industries and resources to ensure shared prosperity, equitable wealth redistribution to prevent catastrophic inequality, and universal social welfare—including healthcare, education, and housing—to guarantee dignity for all. It demands an end to exploitation in all forms, ensuring AI serves the collective good rather than becoming an exterminating monster. International solidarity must replace competition, fostering global cooperation to manage AI’s risks and rewards, while democratic decision-making in politics and the economy ensures broad societal control over AI’s development and the fair distribution of its benefits.